RE: Sports Talk Social: The Community's Future
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think we all want the community to do well. The people mentioned like myself post regularly on sport so want to see Sports have a game plan which it doesn't seem to have. THe Discord channel is dead and take for example the Fantasy premier league discord is a Hive of activity amd great fun actually.
I think what @cryptosimplify is trying to achieve is good intentions and we are lucky he is interested in making the tribe better as well. Nobody is planning a coup but there needs to be a discussion about where we are heading. Some type of townhall where everyone who is interested takes part. You dont need to be a dev to have a plan or roadmap. Yep we seem to be decentralised in one way but so are the other tribes and they are still led by a group of stakeholders that are active in the community. Doing something , anything is better than doing nothing at all. @cryptosimplify proposal whether it gets through or not should be the kick starter for new ideas around the future of sportstalk
That is my point to think a create a roadmap it is not necessary to be a dev.
We can define some tasks that needs software development but the execution comes later and when we reach hat point we analyse the Best approach to that.
However, to be able to do this kind of thing and start doing something I think DAO it is not good because we will not be able to agile as necessary since it is necessary to get votes and people can be days or weeks without come to here.
What kind of community change is so urgent that it would require a more agile decision path?
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
For example, finding a dev who says he has some free time today and could make some needed changes to the front end.
I've had contact with cases like these outside Hive so I wouldn't be surprised if this happens someday.
Why does the community need to be consulted for front end changes? The front end is ran by Hive Engine so if you made changes to it you could send them upstream to HE and they could implement.
But doesn't the frontend also fit for being a community asset?
Or is it only the things that are onchain that belong to the community?
So I get confused about decentralization and that the community should have voting power on everything.
One reason would be the payment for that work.
Not really because it can't be held by the blockchain accounts. I am just willing to give it to someone else if the community thought they'd be a better custodian of it. There can be multiple frontends though. You could spin up simplysports.com and use SPORTS your own way. We used to run sportstalksocial.com for the outpost and sportstalk.social for the old style.
More or less. Unless there's a legal entity how would a blockchain own other assets?
Payments should be handled by token fund requests. If a token fund request receives support beyond the funding limit then it will payout on day one. Additionally payment proposals can be made on a future date to build support.
I was expecting since we are a decentralized community I was expecting everything related with the community even what is off chain was part of community assets, but I am wrong.
That was the point. If it is necessary to be agile, we are not able to do it.