RE: Brainstorming...
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
You're right, that might work. I don't know how to automate the following of every account, I couldn't possibly do it manually. Then there's my lack of real wealth to buy HIVE to stake on said account to make it function.
That would be ripe for abuse though too. I think it's 10,000 HP to 'unlock' account creation priveleges on the blockchain level. Then you can create new accounts with the only cost being Resource Credits. People could double, triple, quadruple, et cetera dip on votes from this hypothetical account by creating new accounts for themselves.
Right back at the beginning of our talk you said (paraphrasing) 'as long as it doesn't benefit those at the top...'
I wonder if that is inevitable for any system of resource allocation built on quantification and numerals. The prevailing tendency is that higher number = greater power over resource allocation in a positive feedback loop for the actor
Those at the bottom need it.... I don't know how you can manage that. I don't have the technical know how.
I know mate, I truly know!
Are there individuals with Hive accounts that need help that you know of?
Maybe you can start a registry for minnows. Hive Minnow Registry and you can upvote those accounts.
I think there already exists minnow support initiatives on Hive! Let me look...
Edit: Yeah, there's many.
@tenkminnows was the first I saw, being run by @steevc
Found a whole bunch more leads by searching 'minnow' on the Ecency app. Would need to run through and see what was current and what was defuct / abandoned / part of the legacy chain though.
There's also the Minnow Support Project:
@minnowsupport
@msp-curation
And possibly other accounts too, which is upvoting accounts actively.
We should be able to get involved in these initiatives in some way. It would be more effective to join what already exists than to try forge a new path with that, in my opinion
Well. Seems like you have a path