A year contract for Aubameyang?

Licenseable

It's not the money that Chelsea would pay for Barcelona concerning Pierre Emerick Aubameyang the problem, the problem is the verbal agreement between Chelsea and Pierre Emerick Aubameyang, Chelsea don't want to give him more than just a year because he is 33 years of age, but Aubameyang demand 2 years. Chelsea said they will give him a year and if he do well, they would give him another one year, giving him two years might be pension he would use for the whole two years. That is the way Chelsea does, they don't give players that is above 30 years of age more than a year contract but because Chelsea need an attacker, that is why they go for Aubameyang, he too is old to play at Chelsea.

Aubameyang still plays well and scores, he is not an injury prone player and they see that before they go for him at Barcelona, so I didn't see what would hinder Chelsea from giving him two years contract. Why did Chelsea go for him when they know he is about 30 years in the first place, at least there are players that never clock 30 years of age that Chelsea can go for, so it is even ridiculous for Chelsea to offer Abubameyang that still have contract with Barcelona a year contract when he can stay at Barcelona and spend the one year in peace, not with pressure that he would face at Chelsea as the only one natural striker that they would have and it's not sure that he would have enough goals as other strikers that left Chelsea didn't have enough goals due to Thomas Tuchel's style of play.

Chelsea's philosophy is a year contract to player that is 30 years of age, this is what made Anthony Rudiger leave the club and collect 4 years contract at Real Madrid. The philosophy has give them problem a lot, but they gave Kalidou kunibaly that is above 30 years of age 4 years contract, so the philosophy has even spoiled. Maybe they forget Kalidou kunibaly's age when they want to give him four years contract. Hahahaha. The philosophy they are using at Chelsea in the time of Roman Abrahamoic is different from the philosophy that they are using now So I'm wondering why they would offer Emerick Pierre Aubameyang a year contract when he is still playing good game at Barcelona.

Both Romero Lukaku that is on loan and Timo Werner that Chelsea sold recently didn't have Aubameyang's statistics, so it's better he stay at Barcelona than moving to Chelsea for just a year contract. He is 33 years of age but he plays like he is still in his 20s. He played 23 matches and scored 13 goals, assists not included, even Both Timo Werner and Romero Lukaku didn't exec score 13 goals in their statistics. If Aubameyang demand for 3 years contract from Chelsea, he even merit it. Lewandowski was given like 3 years contract at Barcelona and he is 34 years of age, so Chelsea would loose so much if Manchester United give Aubameyang 2 years contract he demand for.