There is difference

pixabay

There is difference between the new signing of Arsenal and the new signing that Chelsea hijacked from Arsenal in the sense that Arsenal's new signing contributed to the last goal which is the winning goal, while Chelsea's new signing only run and he was stopped by the defender and the defender collected yellow card for that. In the match match between Arsenal and Manchester United, I already knew that Martineli would be substituted because he's no longer the 90 minutes player, so as I saw Trossard (the new player) on the bench, I know he would be the best replacement for Gabriel Martineli, although I never see his play way but what he did at the pitch really show the class of player that he is.

Mudryk only had run, he had chance and wasted it, so he's didn't do as Trossard did when it comes to rating but I still don't know what the future holds, we don't know the lie that could be best among the two but in price, Mudryk is higher than Trossard but in contribution that they made in their first match, Trossard is better than Mudryk. If Trossard isn't a good player, I am very sure that Mikel Arteta won't take him at Arsenal but as Mikel Arteta must have seen his starts, watch what he does and know what he can do later, he ask Edu to sign him and the way that I see Mikel Arteta's football, he's likes utility player and Trossard should be one.

As Mudryk was hijacked, Arsenal has learnt their lesson, Chelsea has teach them lesson that they need to complete player deal without wasting time and according to Trossard's agent, the deal didn't last more than a week and the deal was done. Arsenal fans would be surprised as well because they only heard that a player has been bought and deal almost completed. The agent even said he's the one that offered Arsenal Trossard and they already asked Tottenham Hotspur but Tottenham are procrastinating but Arsenal shown some interest and they signed him.