Weekly Challenge - Aim True

avatar

image.png

Alright, this is it! Another week, another post! Looking forward to this every single week! Now for this week, realised things are slightly different. Now we have ruleset based! So instead of featured monsters, we have featured ruleset! Pretty good actually, as I realise most of the time I do not have the monsters and the timeliness of my post is dependent on my opponents. If I can catch an opponent with the featured monster, then yea. Or else, try again...

So yups, good job to @splinterlands for being so considerate!

Ruleset:

image.png

Description: Melee and ranged attacks will always hit their target.

Note: This applies to magic attacks as well even if there is a phase monster.

Direct Battle Link

https://splinterlands.com?p=battle&id=sl_f28484f9ea4c37d3499a62cb45a216b9&ref=rayius

Screenshot 2023-03-10 at 11.37.21 AM.png

Screenshot 2023-03-10 at 11.37.54 AM.png

Match Condition

Aim True

My Battle Strategy and Cards Placement

Man, I love Bloodlust. So same strategy, put out tanks in front, Captain Katie with the Bloodlust, and behind her will be a bunch of supporters to make sure everyone stays alive!

Did your strategy work? What will you try differently next time?

Yups! Have been and will be continuing to use this strategy. Once the gladiator is buffed up through Bloodlust, they are insanely strong. So I am currently banking on my Gladiators for my wins! Loving them!

Do you like the Aim True? Why or why not?
Well, not really. With gladiators, the bloodlust actually make the speed really high. Meaning a higher chance of dodging. With Aim True, no matter how high your speed, the chances of missing is still zero. So not really actually...

@Splinterlands is such a fantastic and awesome game and once you join then you experience the real gaming fun. Join it through my affiliate link, I am sharing it below-

https://splinterlands.com?ref=rayius

Thank you so much
(Photos and gif I used in this post are taken from splinterlands.com for this post purpose only)



0
0
0.000
2 comments