Digging into the "pay us what you owe us" controversy in WNBA

The latest WNBA All-Star game was marred by a couple of things. For starters, the "Golden Goose" that is Caitlin Clark is injured so she could not participate at all, the actual main game was very lopsided and appeared as though it was an exhibition game with the players not truly going for it, and then there was the fact that all the players used this time to wear shirts demanding more money for the players in the league.


image.png
src

The internet went nuts with this and a lot of people were attacking the players for being unreasonable in demanding more money in a sport that many would argue is not entertaining or competitive and others would argue that it doesn't make any money so how can any money be owed?

Well they have a point, but I am going to stand up (a little bit) for the players especially towards one little piece of information that is almost certainly being misconstrued or misrepresented.

WNBA players have been crying for nearly 30 years about not getting paid enough and there are some people out there that used to pretend to be on their side about this even though if you were to dig into the numbers or just simply look at one of the televised games you could tell that there is no money to give them and that the salary they get already is giveaway money. Some named it the Welfare National Basketball Association because it was no secret that the WNBA was subsidized by NBA profits and to this day a majority of the teams are owned by the same people that own NBA teams.

The financial figures showed that the WNBA lost around $10 million dollars a year, sometimes more. But the one figure that doesn't make a great deal of sense is where they say that they lost $40 million last year even though it was, by far, the biggest year the WNBA has ever had as far as viewership is concerned. Previously they were trying to trick us into watching the games, now people actually want to. This is largely because of the organic popularity of Caitlin Clark and anyone who says otherwise is kidding themselves.


image.png
src

The league tries to push this bit of information to the side stating that the $40 million loss comes from the new agreement that teams will get chartered flights instead of commercial, and also because the WNBA spent more money on advertising in the past year. Of course some of this can be believed but at the same time viewership both on TV and in person is WAY UP and seems to be wanting to stay that way as now other stars are emerging such as Paige Bueckers in Dallas who despite playing for what is arguably the worst team in the league, manages to sell a ton of tickets as well as jerseys.


image.png
src

Speaking of jerseys; Caitlin Clark's Indiana Fever jersey was the 2nd best selling jersey this year. Not the 2nd best selling WNBA jersey, the 2nd best selling basketball jersey. Only Steph Curry sold more than Caitlin. Lebron James was a distant 3rd.

The women are pushing for more money and I think they should get it to a certain degree but if they push too hard they might be digging for gold where there isn't any. This isn't to say that I think every single one of them should be making millions like their NBA counterparts, because that is ridiculous seeing as how the NBA is one of the most popular leagues in the world and brings in hundreds of times the amount of money. But if there is some cheating going on there as far as creative accounting is concerned, they should pay more to the players.

I think that people are gaslit into thinking that the WNBA players are being unreasonable and I would agree that some of them are such as when Angel Reese says that her $75,000 salary doesn't cover her rent. Girl, where are you living that costs $8000 a month? Maybe downgrade a lil bit?

But here is the main point that I am trying to make: perhaps people out there shouldn't allow themselves to be rage-baited or gaslit into thinking that these women are just being greedy nincompoops. When a very large organization claims they lost a bunch of money there is a very good reason for you to be skeptical about this.

I lie as much as I can get away with on my own tax returns and I think most other people do as well. Hell, an entire chain of stores exist that will assist you in lying as much as you can reasonably get away with when it comes to paying your own taxes. If you can make a business appear as though it is losing money, you get a massive break on taxes and the extremely large accounting firms specialize in doing exactly that. When the WNBA commissioner comes out and states that the league that just finished having by far its best season ever is losing scores of millions of dollars, I think you should be very skeptical of what this person is saying.

I read up on it a bit and found out that many of the teams' accounting records are intermingled with other professional teams in a portfolio of sorts and it is the prime directive of these firms to maximize their own profits by any legal way possible - even if these are of questionable legality. A lot of what takes place inside of accounting firms is intentionally misleading and intentionally complicated to discourage anyone from really finding out what is actually going on there.

Do I think that WNBA teams make a ton of money? Outside of the Indian Fever, no. But I do believe that they make more than zero dollars and the claim that they are losing $40 million sounds like a ton of nonsense to me that is done intentionally for tax avoidance. It happens in every other industry so why not this one?

The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) that is happening in October of 2025 between the players union and the WNBA I think it going to pan out like this: The owners will meet the players halfway, but not because everyone is happy and agrees on what is fair. I think that the owners are going to realize that if they are subjected to a serious and thorough audit it will be revealed that they are "cheating" on their income statements. In the interest of not having this information go public, they will make a deal.

I'm just saying to not join in on the WNBA hate trend that is going on right now just because a commissioner, without any real evidence, claims the league is losing money. I don't buy it! Do you?



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

I agreee! They deserve so much mooore! They’ve worked so hard to grow the league and now the numbers speak for themselves, thanks to these amazing players 🙌🏻 I hope they get fairly compensated for that. It’s about time their hard work and growing fanbase pay off!

!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

well maybe no "so much more" but if the league is in fact making money then this should be profit-shared. But there is also the question of the amount of money the league has lost up to this point, we need to consider that they need to recoup this money because it's been nearly 30 years and it has never been profitable... so they say. If this is true that they never made money then why would they keep it going... why would more teams be getting added? this is why I don't believe what they are saying about losing money every year. Very rich people don't generally keep something around that is losing money for 30 years. Somebody's lying.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @sports.guy55! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 110000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 120000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would say it is a bit of both going on here and if the league is in fact losing money then they are going about this the wrong way. As fragile as it sounds if Clark broke her arm or leg then this is not a league worthy of more money.

0
0
0.000
avatar

the entire thing hinges on her at the moment. We can already see how people watch the games considerably less when she is out injured and there are also people at the games that have been seeking refunds if Caitlin doesn't play, lol.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes this is not really a business model or even a business that sponsors want to rely on because it is reliant on one person. When Clark retires what then?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think they are trying to develop other players in the same light but then we run into the problem of whenever a person that they are making a push for, such as is the case with Paige Bueckers now, everyone cries that it is racist because Paige is white. Simply can't win with these people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No you cannot win which is crazy. if they want the sport to survive the way it is then they better come up with other players.

0
0
0.000