Is T20 Cricket Making Our Batsmen Soft?

avatar

Firstly, let me preface this by stating that I have not seen any footage of this match, but am merely speculating based on what I have read.

Less than three weeks out from arguably the most prestigious cricket event of the Australian summer, the Boxing Day Test, the MCG hosted a Sheffield Sheid match between Victoria and Western Australia. The weather was fine, light was good, but on the first morning, after a mere 39.4 overs, play was abandoned. Why? The official reason was recorded as an unsafe pitch after a few deliveries popped up and struck batsman Marcus Stoinis.

Umpires gave groundstaff the opportunity to re-roll the pitch before play was scheduled the following morning, however it was decided that there had not been sufficient improvement in conditions.

The question I ask, and again, this is without seeing any footage of the game, is whether or not heavy bats and batting friendly conditions produced particularly for entertaining and high scoring T20 matches is harming the standard of World Cricket. Are these conditions conditioning batsmen against self preservation and instilling an unsafe level of confidence in how true the bounce of a bowler will be during matches?

I grew up in the days before T20 cricket, when Tests were considered the absoulte pinacle and 50 over matches rarely produced an innings over 250 - these days 250 is considered a low score. In those days we had bowlers like Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis terrorising batsmen worldwide. Players had to learn how to protect themselves first, bat themselves in and then score runs.

Whilst the fast and furious pace of high scoring matches is fantastic from a spectator perspective, and bums on seats means more gate revenue and merchandise sales, but what are we doing to our bowlers? Sure, nobody wants another Phil Hughes tragedy, but now it seems that when we get conditions that aren't like batting on the M1 Freeway, players panic and the game gets abandoned.

Let's get back to an even contest between bat and ball, where everyone gets to showcase their talent. What are your thoughts?

image.png



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There absolutely needs to be more in pitches to make it an even contest between bat and ball. However I wouldn’t expect to see guys running in and bowling 130-135kmph on a length or just back of a length and the batsmen getting hit. If Peter Siddle is capable of getting that kind of uneven bounce off a surface in the first session of day one imagine what a genuinely fast bowler is going to do on day 4 or 5 - except of course the game will never get that far because the balance on a pitch like that is way too far in favour of the bowlers and yes it is dangerous to bat on

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C7OPDxT7mU8

0
0
0.000
avatar

That clip was the first time I've seen anything from the match, and yes it did look bad and would be much worse if the likes of Josh Hazlewood or Pat Cummins were charging in rather than Peter Siddle. Having said that, I think more experienced batsmen who have played in a wider range of conditions worldwide may well have had a lot less difficulty negotiating those deliveries.

Either way, we have to trust the decisions of the match officials to be made in the best interests of player safety.

0
0
0.000