Why don't Americans play cricket?

avatar

Take a look at many of my previous posts and you'll notice an obvious theme with the countries that I mention are competing in international cricket - they are all former British colonies. The Indian sub-continent the fabled jewel in the crown of the British Empire with its population of over a billion people is crazy about the sport! For the nation-states of Oceania and Southern Africa, cricket is very much the number 1 summer game. Crossing the Atlantic, the Caribbean has always been a stronghold for cricket and even the Canadians now have their own T20 league that attracts some of the game's biggest names in the game. And yet, there remains one very obvious exception to this trend in the form of The United States of America.

Why is it that the game has never flourished in the land of the free and is there a place for cricket there in the future?

These questions will be considered in the below post as well as a general tour of the history of cricket in the USA.

7fb241ef74018c5e_800.png
The Homies and Popz are an American cricket club that recently toured Australia

A question of class

As with large parts of the British Empire that have ended up adopting the sport of cricket, the game was initially brought to the shores of America by the social elite of England. In cities such as Philadelphia, Boston and New York, a number of cricket clubs were formed to serve the interests of the upper classes during the 2nd part of the 19th century. While cricket remained very popular amongst "old-money" on the East Coast, there seems to have been very little attempt to push the game out to the masses. This unwillingness to develop the game in America from the bottom-up can ultimately be seen as a contributing factor to crickets failure to establish a heavy presence in the country.

72578cd327de734d_800.png
source

f74c6fd7b41e76b2_800.png
An artist's impression of a Philadelphia cricket match during the 19th-century

By contrast in countries such as India, with its strict caste system, the elite classes needn't be as fearful of their position within society. Scholars have argued that as a result of this, the upper-classes were much more willing to introduce the sport amongst the masses and in fact that the British elite often liked to think that they had converted the Indian locals to their summer pastime in the same way that a missionary might spread religion.

American Nationalism

This is an argument that I have heard on several occasions as to why cricket never took off in the States. In a nutshell, it suggests that in order to separate themselves from their previous rulers, the people of the new republic wanted to establish a sport that represented its independence from Britain. For America, that new sport (and a direct rival to cricket) was to be baseball, a game that was allegedly created by no less than a civil war hero by the name of Abner Doubleday. The 1907 Major League Baseball (MLB) commission stated that

ce6776f605acc737_800.png
source

However, there is now growing evidence that disputes the findings of the 1907 MLB commission and instead, multiple scholars now believe much of the Doubleday claims to be a myth propagated in the early 20th century to ensure that Baseball became established as the national past-time of America.

2fa12c076869fadf_800.jpeg

and a lie ...... Well at least the baseball bit!

But was nationalism really the reason that cricket got edged out of daily sporting life in America? After all, games like golf and tennis which were also brought over by British immigrants have thrived on the other side of the Atlantic. Perhaps, instead of nationalism, it was simply the case that bat and ball games already existed in multiple parts of America that more closely resembled baseball than they did cricket. According to sport's historian George Kirsch, these included games such as rounders, old cat and base which would all ultimately go on to be refined into the sport of baseball.

Is the sport of cricket compatible with the American psyche?

Maybe Americans just don't like cricket and what they perceive it stands for. It would be interesting to do a simple word association or brainstorm around the word "cricket" and see what first springs to the minds of the American contributors to this platform. My guess is most of them would initially think of a small grasshopper-like insect and even if you could get them past that and onto the sport itself the predominant view would probably be that cricket is "slow", "complex" and "traditional". There may even be those who would view the game as slightly "effeminate" in comparison to some other popular sports in North America. If you're from North America and reading this blog, please feel free to let me know what first came to your mind when hearing the word cricket?

b5f7667954f8842e_800.jpeg
The question here is for what audience is this match being played? I'd assume that in general, the target would be Caribean and South Asian migrants

At this point, it's also worth drawing back from casting too many assumptions based on national stereotypes. There are plenty of Englishman who would also feel that the sport is boring or overly complicated and have no desire to watch or play it. However, you only have to watch a couple of US sports shows to realise that Americans have values that may not be compatible with cricket.

Bland white clothes - not likely to see any major US sports franchise turn up dressed like that!

Dull historical names like Middlesex - why not rebrand them as the London Cowboys?

Games that take 5 days to complete and still end up a draw - WTF?

In general, it has just been quite difficult to really sell the idea of cricket into the American market or at least that used to be the case..........

T20 Cricket and a chance of a new beginning

The introduction and rise of T20 cricket over the past couple of decades breaths fresh hope into the idea that America and other parts of the world that have yet to take to the game of cricket might now be ready to join the party.

fcf4998791555bd8_800.jpeg
IPL Cheerleaders - the game of cricket has changed radically over the past decade

T20 cricket ticks all the boxes to be a hit in America. It is fast, it is explosive, it brings a bit of colour and razzamatazz to its viewers. The players that compete in competitions such as the Indian Premier League (IPL) are modern athletes - their celebrity status is just as much a part of the excitement as their performances on the pitch. The IPL brand alone is already worth $6billion with that figure looking likely to grow as the tournament goes from strength to strength. Modern T20 franchises are replacing traditional cricket clubs all over the world and with them, they are bringing new exciting branding, colours and even cheerleaders to cricket venues. Instead of taking 5 days to complete, a match can now be over in less than 3 hours.


Could big-hitting T20 cricket make an impact in the USA?

It's also worth remembering that just from a sheer numbers point of view, the likes of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (all big players and watchers of cricket) are likely to see population booms over the next 20-30 years. Whether it's from migration into countries such as America or just the general turning of the wheel of history that will see the likes of India flex its muscles on the global stage, it's reasonable to believe that cricket could well find it's way onto more American television sets in the near future.



0
0
0.000
19 comments
avatar

A great time to revisit this topic on the heals of one of the most exciting World Series finishing up last night.

It does seem like the MLB is making inroads with fans in London, but I'm not sure if T20 or other cricket leagues have made proper attempts to court America fans. Has there even been a concerted effort (ie investing money) to grow the sport here in the State?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Really? I didn't even know it was the World Series, lol

No, I don't think there really has been a concerted effort to put money into cricket in the States. One of the other reasons that cricket probably hasn't taken off and a reason that holds it back across the world is the need for specialist playing areas. Pitch conditions are such a major factor in cricket because the ball is bounced when you compare that to baseball which you can pretty much play in any field. Developing playing arenas just at grassroots level would need a huge investment

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed, but baseball is very similar to cricket and the Americans have created this direction of the game, but I hope that the T20 cricket will also be popular in America and will find its fans.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Certainly difficult for cricket with baseball already established but the viewing figures for baseball have been dropping for the past 30-years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Series_television_ratings

ESPN estimates that there are 30million cricket fans in the USA - most of them are 1st to 3rd generation migrants from Asia. Market forces will ultimately lead to more cricket being shown and played in the USA

0
0
0.000
avatar

World Series television ratings
The highest average Nielsen ratings for an entire World Series is tied between the 1978 Series featuring the New York Yankees and Los Angeles Dodgers and the 1980 Series featuring the Philadelphia Phillies and Kansas City Royals. Both Series, each of which went six games, averaged a national rating of 32.8 and a share of 56. However, the 1978 Series had a slightly larger total viewership (44,278,950) than 1980 (42,300,000).
The highest-rated individual game in Series history was Game 7 in 1986, as the New York Mets defeated the Boston Red Sox at Shea Stadium in New York City.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, if the American's start playing cricket let's hope they don't learn bad habits from the Aussie's - No sand-paper ball tampering thanks.

P.s. I'm an Aussie...Still not over the embarrassment that debacle caused, nor do I believe the perpetrators should have been given a second chance. Good post mate.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Haha let's hope not!

I find it interesting that most Aussies I talk to are still really pissed with the team for sandpaper gate. I think most English fans are happy to move on

0
0
0.000
avatar

It embarrassed us and I don't follow the team any longer. In fact I have gone right off cricket to be honest. I just lost interest. I don't like the way it was dealt with and do not agree they should still be playing. Just me though, I'm not a big fan of cheaters.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh thats a great comment .... bad habits from AUS !!!!! Team australia is a very capable team with many good players, still they never respect the game.

Ball tampering in not new now (smith and warner case) , but in past also they have indulge in many such cases.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, they are a bunch of hubris-loaded, egotistical idiots if you ask me...And I'm an Aussie saying this. They need to pull their heads in and just play the game. Not very good role-models.

Posted using Partiko Android

0
0
0.000
avatar

This question has been bordering me over time. I never knew the reason behind it as well. Will have to do my further findings here

0
0
0.000
avatar

Have you answered the same question about Rugby? Love this post.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I haven't but it'd make an interesting piece to research. The last blog I wrote on the All Blacks 1905 tour of the Northern Hemisphere saw them play a couple of matches on the other side of the Atlantic so undoubtedly there was Rugby being played in the States

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hate it when they call actual football "soccer" and then call that gladiator sport Football. Really grinds my gears

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi, am from India and my brother stays in US. He is a very good cricketer and he is playing for a club in US too.

So I think in US people are still playing cricket. In the photo he sends, I have seen many american in his team.

May be its not that popular there to catch the eyeball, but once it ll become widely adopted, we may see American team playing in cricket worldcup soon

0
0
0.000
avatar

That’s interesting to learn and as per my comments to another user fits with the numbers that ESPN estimate.

Is it mainly migrants from the Indian sub-continent who are playing or do white Americans also join? You get some photos from your brother. It’d make an interesting blog!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can't stand it when they call football "Soccer" and then refer to that gladiator sport as "Football". They barely even kick the ball ffs.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A fact that I’ve pointed out to many of our American cousins over the years 😁

0
0
0.000