Drawing A Line In The Sand


source

Last night I saw on Twitter people bitching about the television crews filming the Erikkson incident live. A post by @tarazkp hit the nail on the head as everyone had the choice of switching off or watching. Most people will watch in fascination whilst telling you how terrible this is. Most people have double standards that don't apply to them so is this right or wrong?

This is not the first time I believe the television and media have crossed the line as this has happened before. No wonder the players formed a circle around the player as everyone knows how bad the media are. Rules don't apply to them as they are just like everyone else curious to see what is happening.

I have experienced similar circumstances on the sporting field first hand during my playing days. No defibrillators thankfully were required, but on two occasions the players tongue was removed from his throat and rolled on his side. This I believe every sportsmen should know as the basics for first aid. If you were watching only one player realised this and what would of happened if he wasn't on the pitch? The referees and officials should also be fully up to date with the basics of assisting with medical emergencies and not just doctors who are a good 30 second sprint away.

Remember that fateful weekend when Roland Ratzenberger and Ayrton Senna died on the same race track within 24 hours of each other? There was no excuse for how poorly this television coverage was done as zooming in on a dead mans body is not exactly prime viewing. Afterwards the media did agree to pan away from a serious accident, but lately that hasn't been the case.


source

Romains kids were watching this at home and that for me is just not right.

Last season Romain Grosjean got lucky after nearly being spit roasted yet the cameras didn't pan away. What if he hadn't stepped out of the fireball and had been killed as not everything is a Hollywood movie as this is real stuff? I do believe these are questions that should be clarified by each sports governing body and not left up to the discretion of the media.

I used to watch the start of the Grand Prix as there was always accidents not in the hope of seeing someone injured, but it just made the race more interesting. I know I wasn't alone in this as many of my friends thought the same thing. Why do we laugh when a batsmen playing cricket gets hit in the box or a player gets tackled heavily in rugby. These are not that funny if you are on the receiving end yet they are as they are not life threatening. No one really wants to see someone get hurt or in distress and that should be the line in the sand as far as I am concerned.


This is funny as once isn't that bad, but 3 times is owning your bad luck.

I do believe the sporting bodies have to come to some sort of agreement to highlight what is acceptable viewing or not.



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

Most people will watch in fascination whilst telling you how terrible this is. Most people have double standards that don't apply to them so is this right or wrong?

Hit the nail on the head there. I didn't watch the game but I heard about the incident and saw videos from YouTube. I genuinely checked out of curiosity and was thankful he was announced stable. A lot of people are hypocrites, but if I didn't find it so easily online that would be better. We can take action without hypocritical outcries

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very true and why personally I don't think it is right for broadcasters to carry on with a live stream when there is something that is obviously wrong. They dodge streakers and pan away or go back to the studio so why not when there is a serious injury or a life threatening incident such as this case. Injuries I am not so worried about but this was a clear case of over stepping what should be a private moment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Did he receive an injection shortly before this incident?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wouldn't have a clue what caused this and most likely was a random event. Sometimes it could be the heat or something bizarre. He will undergo tests and I am sure we will hear about why this happened. Will he be able to play again is another question as the last guy that had a heart attack never returned to the playing field.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Saying a regulatory team be formed on what the media broadcast,I don't think it's something that will work out, as they tend to share life event and what they lay camera on. But I'm will say they should give a little privacy to certain actions.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @cryptoandcoffee! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I understand how that feels, its always terrifying. At some point, the media guys are working with the intention of giving out full coverage of the eveñt for record sake.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Time and again we see such incidents getting repeated.
Media does whatever it can to increase their TRP and needs strict rules to be implemented.

While we love the sportsmen to excel in any sports, but it shouldn't be at the expense of their life and safety measures shouldn't cost them much when compared to the money being poured in into Sports these days

0
0
0.000