My today's chess problem for you to finish (Deutsch*English) Mein heutiges Schachproblem für dich zum Vollenden

avatar
(Edited)

My today's chess problem for you to finish

Hallo everyone, I'd like to share a chess problem with you.

With 18. Qxh3 I wasn't attentive enough to move the pawn to f6. My question to you is, how would you have defended the game after 19. Qf6?

Here's the chess match for you to push pieces:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/295115046?tab=analysis

Screenshot at 20201222 135839 anli chesscom my todays chess problem.png


andli19 at instagram



Posted to Instagram manually.


#deutsch

Mein heutiges Schachproblem für dich zum Vollenden

Hallo zusammen, ich will ein Schachproblem mit euch teilen.

Bei 18. Dxh3 war ich nicht aufmerksam genug, um den Bauern nach f6 zu ziehen. Meine Frage an euch ist, wie hättet ihr die Partie nach 19. Df6 verteidigt?

Hier ist die Schachpartie für dich zum Figurenschieben:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/295115046?tab=analysis

Screenshot at 20201222 135839 anli chesscom my todays chess problem.png



andli19 at instagram



Geposted nach Instagram per Hand.



0
0
0.000
30 comments
avatar

Congratulations @anli! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published more than 100 posts. Your next target is to reach 150 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:

HiveFest⁵ feedback and contest results
It's today! Do not miss the opening of HiveFest⁵
0
0
0.000
avatar

My chess defensive don’t always produce a win BUT:

The white king does not have great defensive position. I would use my pawns to block the bishop and attempt to get an open line to the white king with my rooks.

(of course in my tournament play I can never see the queen/bishop checkmate coming and I have no defense for it 😀)

the chess engine apparently disagree with my play below but this would be an accurate example of my current chess play.

ani3.gif

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, I see!

  1. d4
    instead of
  2. dxc4
    for moving into the line of fire.

Well, the problem was, I was blind to the bishop. Just as you tell in brackets. And I have not even seen it in this daily without any hassle. But you know what, this patzer has great potential to improve on us!! (I just found "patzer" in a dictionary. 😂)

Thank you for visiting my yesterday's chess problem, @rodrook! !invest_vote !BEER !ENGAGE 25 (The last I'm just practicing by now, can't wait to fund it through some rewards. I'm already more then half way there.)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Now I have 1001 ENGAGE and this should do it !ENGAGE12

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Qf5 is the only way to defend. The White Queen has now to retreat or gets exchanged after Bb2.
Lesson to learn: If you have weakened your Kings position with g6, and don´t have a blacksquared Bishop anymore, then you have to be overly careful to protect that dangerous a1-h8 diagonal!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, you mean all king surrounding pawns white, so black squares are open for intrusion. Wow! And no blacksquared bishop far and wide. Right!! Lesson learned. Qf5 is a brilliant move for direct clearance! Thanks for sharing this with us. If only I had seen the opposing blacksquared bishop before he got into position!

In the meantime I could convert some DEC into ENGAGE, so here's my appreciation for visiting with us. Marry Christmas !ENGAGE 25

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks!
Why not participating in our Hivechess tournaments! It´s fun and one can learn a lot!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Now I have 1001 ENGAGE and this should do it !ENGAGE12

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You need to own more token

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, why more, @misterengagement? I thought 1,000 is the threshold (see the other comment in is this thread). @minismallholding, do you have an idea?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Could be that if you've only just gone past the 1000 threshold, it hasn't registered yet. @abh12345, any ideas?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hm. So let me take another chance with "more". !ENGAGE 12

That's what I love and hate about decentralized technology: always potential for better documentation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There you go! It's 1001 Dalmatian

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hmm. It did say 1000 too, but I do vaguely remember something being said about it needing 1001 minimum, now. @abh12345, perhaps the mister engagement comment above needs changing to reflect this.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Even 1000.001 might be enough, then mathematically it might just be "more then 1000". It sure is a good idea to be precise, either with documentation or with implementation. !ENGAGE 10

Anyway, it's fun to ride this wave, when it's there. yyeehaa

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Now I have 1001 ENGAGE and this should do it !ENGAGE12

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000