RE: My today's chess problem for you to finish (Deutsch*English) Mein heutiges Schachproblem für dich zum Vollenden
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Qf5 is the only way to defend. The White Queen has now to retreat or gets exchanged after Bb2.
Lesson to learn: If you have weakened your Kings position with g6, and don´t have a blacksquared Bishop anymore, then you have to be overly careful to protect that dangerous a1-h8 diagonal!
0
0
0.000
Oh, you mean all king surrounding pawns white, so black squares are open for intrusion. Wow! And no blacksquared bishop far and wide. Right!! Lesson learned. Qf5 is a brilliant move for direct clearance! Thanks for sharing this with us. If only I had seen the opposing blacksquared bishop before he got into position!
In the meantime I could convert some DEC into ENGAGE, so here's my appreciation for visiting with us. Marry Christmas !ENGAGE 25
Thanks!
Why not participating in our Hivechess tournaments! It´s fun and one can learn a lot!
Thanks for the garrulous reminder! I'm still into slow chess. It's that simple. Sometimes the vein is good and I'll hop on. Looks not like today. Have fun with each other!! !invest_vote !ENGAGE 12
On slow chess, see https://peakd.com/hive-157286/@anli/re-stayoutoftherz-qjpe7i
@anli denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient!
@anli thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !
You need to own more token
Now I have 1001 ENGAGE and this should do it !ENGAGE12
ENGAGEtokens.You need to own more token
Oh, why more, @misterengagement? I thought 1,000 is the threshold (see the other comment in is this thread). @minismallholding, do you have an idea?
Could be that if you've only just gone past the 1000 threshold, it hasn't registered yet. @abh12345, any ideas?
Thank you, @minismallholding! So let's give this another try... !ENGAGE 12
You need to own more token
Hm. So let me take another chance with "more". !ENGAGE 12
That's what I love and hate about decentralized technology: always potential for better documentation.
ENGAGEtokens.There you go! It's 1001 Dalmatian
Hmm. It did say 1000 too, but I do vaguely remember something being said about it needing 1001 minimum, now. @abh12345, perhaps the mister engagement comment above needs changing to reflect this.
Even 1000.001 might be enough, then mathematically it might just be "more then 1000". It sure is a good idea to be precise, either with documentation or with implementation. !ENGAGE 10
Anyway, it's fun to ride this wave, when it's there. yyeehaa
ENGAGEtokens.Now I have 1001 ENGAGE and this should do it !ENGAGE12
ENGAGEtokens.