RE: Sports Talk Social: The Community's Future
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I don't think you're a problem at all @cryptosimplify. You see an issue and you're trying to provide solutions to get it fixed. I think that's admirable. I just think you are just targetting the wrong problem.
We've tried lots of things in the tribe. As I've tried to point out we've even tried to implement a lot of the ideas you presented in the past because they're good ideas.
I don't think we've had a shortage of ideas in SPORTS. I think we've had a shortage of people that can execute them in development. That's where I think you could take us to a whole different level. You have development skills that most of us don't have. We haven't had a need for a new key holder because I only do what the tribe asks anyways. What I think we need is someone who can build things the tribe needs. I think that's the problem that needs targetting.
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
I can understand the lack of development skill but there other ideas that is not necessary be a dev to implement.
But we cannot do it because of DAO since our community it is owner by Actifity users
I don't think there are many things that Actifit users would block to be honest. The only ones I could see are ones that limit them in some way like removing their delegation from @sports-gov and thus ending the partnership. I can't imagine that many of their backers would be excited for that. Otherwise what would we want to do that they wouldn't support if it makes the tribe better?
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
It is this a partnership?
Partnership or a partnership is a relationship in which two or more people, organizations, or countries work together as partners.
In this case, I don't see any good thing for our side.
Since @actifit.rewards uses our delegation to vote on Actifit community posts, and we don't receive anything.
How this is good for sports talk social?
I am not able to see how this is benefit for us.
We get the inclusion of the SPORTS token into an app that is distributing tokens to more users than any other app in our ecosystem. Those users then either 1) sell SPORTS making it cheaper for non-Actifit users to acquire SPORTS 2) hold/stake SPORTS thus keeping more tokens off the market and supporting content they appreciate.
If it's option 1 then we'll see enough stake ready to move away from that deal with time. If it's option 2 then not only are they distributing out to a large group they're also creating token holders it would seem.
I think this image show more than words that we need a lot of changes
That has nothing to do with Actifit?
I know that but my post it is not only about Actifit it is about sports talk community and this is related with the community