RE: Sports Talk Social: The Community's Future
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I personally don't like using Discord, Telegram or even Matrix because we have on-chain communication that works even better. I'm still up for making any changes to improve them though. I just haven't heard anything beyond people saying there's no activity which I've tried to address by linking them across multiple centralized networks to make it easier to join.
We get the inclusion of the SPORTS token into an app that is distributing tokens to more users than any other app in our ecosystem. I think that's a pretty spectactular deal for us to be honest.
That being said if Actifit is just leeching from our ecosystem then it wouldn't take long for the market conditions to change that non-Actifit holding stakeholders would be the ones building stake to lead the community away from Actifit. If that partnership isn't also breeding SPORTS stakeholders then proposal conditions would change in time allowing us to remove the delegation.
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
And why is there almost no activity on any of our Discord, Telegram, etc or even Twitter?
Maybe because we're not managing to keep people interested in the community and wanting to talk.
Seriously, was it a good deal? I don't see LeoFinance doing that and they are way better than us and with a super active community even when their tokens have devalued.
It seems to me that this was not so beneficial for us since we have the token being distributed in droves out there.
Do you think people will invest I don't know how much money in a token from an "almost" dead community to try to remove a culprit that is clearly not beneficial?
If there are still active users in the community who create good/excellent content about sports, we can thank ODC and some Hive users who have good stakes and will still vote here because if it were for our token, many of these users would be gone although.
Happy to help you with your proposal to handle social media for the tribe.
No but they aren't being given SPORTS stake. If they aren't providing valuable content to stakeholders then their share of the tribe will diminish without anyone having to purchase them out. Unless of course the content creators are just selling off their stake and the Actifit community is the one buying. Wouldn't know anyone that sells off all the stake they earn in the community would you?
I am not a social media manager but thanks.
I don't know if there are people selling all the SPORTS they earn or not, but even if there are, they are within their rights since this is about blockchain and whoever has the private keys decides what to do with their assets.
The fact that, from the beginning, the Actifit community has had access to more SPORTS makes the elements of that community win more SPORTS, so they always end up increasing their stake so that the community can have enough stake to approve something they need to invest a considerable amount.
How? They have a Hive delegation.
And they have also SPORTS staked from contract distribution.
So if they but on Actifity community content that uses sports or sportstalksocial whey will receive more SPORTS ;)
I think you mean the portion that Actifit keeps for the app beneficiary. They receive the same amount if you assume the creators are likely Actifit friendly anyway. Even if you assume the Actifit users would potentially be less Actifit friendly than Actifit themselves well Actifit only has around 5M SPORTS (0.27% of Governance Power) or roughly 64 Hive worth of stake so it's not like they are a huge voting block.