RE: Sports Talk Social: The Community's Future
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It's certainly above board in that I would be willing to make the transfer of the keys for all community accounts if the community voted a governance proposal that told me to do that. I just don't see the value in doing so. I feel like we've already dealt with key management in the last governance proposal and that we have more important things to focus on than playing hot potato with who's in charge. I'd rather keep things where no one is in charge and stakeholders can vote as needed.
If I were to transfer them over what I'd prefer to see is them moved to a witnesss based multisig system. Each witness would run a node with governance built into the code. The code should allow SPORTS stakeholders to vote for witnesses with onchain json. If witness consensus changes and a witness is un-elected and a new witness is elected then the node software should automatically create a multisig transaction changing the signers that the other witnesses would sign thus changing the keys to match the newly elected witnesses. If a witness didn't sign on so many consecutive blocks then they would automatically be pulled from consensus until they started signing blocks again.
I think that's the real place we'd need to go to but I don't have the development skills to create that. If we did have that built we could even build in all the functionality of the ARCHON system without relying on another tribe to manage it.
What's even more exciting is with a system for witnesses like that it could be expanded into other witness groups that say were elected to serve as Oracles for other kinds of voting systems. This could lead to someone creating SPORTS gaming systems based on decentralized elected oracle witnesses. We could have sports gaming where people put SPORTS into an account controlled by a multisig of oracle witnesses and as they sign oracle information they pay out to anyone participating.
The problem isn't ideas, it's finding people who can implement ideas into executable code.
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
I think they are working on that behind the scenes as far as the Hive side of things. From what I have heard anyway. I know that Hive Engine and Splinterlands already have their own nodes, but with some of the stuff DLUX (I think) is doing, it could be any community running their own nodes and having governance that way. I get there is a lot of background stuff that needs to happen to get us there. As you said, I think right now we have some other more pressing issues to deal with. At the very least I am glad people are finally starting to care a little more.
Yeah I'm interested in what's being built on the DLUX layer. I could see us making the move over at some point when you compare the feature roadmaps of Hive Engine / DLUX. Maybe I'm out of the HE dev loop but I haven't heard anything in the pipes for solutions like that on this side.
Posted using SportsTalkSocial
Taskmaster has touched in some of it a couple of times. I think they are working from a couple of different angles between a couple of different teams.